All assets are assessed against the same set of criteria to make sure we are consistent.
A level of significance to the criteria will be given to each asset.
The possible levels of significance are:
- outstanding
- high
- moderate
- little
- none
We will assess each nomination against the criteria. Once assessed we will assign a level. To be included on the list, the asset must achieve one of these requirements:
- outstanding local interest in one criterion. This bar is set very high. Assets of this value may warrant consideration for national designation
- high local interest in one criterion and at least moderate in two others
- moderate or above in four or more of the criteria
For example:
| Asset name |
Archaeological Value |
Historic Illustrative Value |
Historic Associative Value |
Architectural Value |
Aesthetic Value |
Communal Value |
Criteria met for inclusion on the list |
| Building A |
None |
Moderate |
Little |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Little |
No |
| Building B |
None |
Moderate |
Little |
High |
Moderate |
Little |
Yes |
| Structure |
None |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Modeate |
Yes |
| Park |
Little |
Moderate |
Little |
Little |
High |
High |
Yes |
There is always an element of judgement when assessing the significance of an asset. Setting these standards:
- allows the final decision to be clearly presented and justified
- minimises discrepancies between assessors
- helps future assessors to:
- understand previous decisions
- carry out their own assessments in line with these standards
See our extra help page for example case studies where you can see how the assessment process works.